2012년 9월 17일 월요일

Flood


Case Study – Flood of Thailand 2011
<Selfish government made a bad decision. I think people should be equal
Rich=Poor>
Values
Economic
Education
Recreation


Positive Short-Term Consequences

Positive to the rich people.





No,
No (except computer addicted people)


Negative Short-Term Consequences

Negative to the poor people because the government decided to protect Bangkok (Rich people).


All schools were closed for a while because it was very dangerous out there. Students were not able to get a proper education.
Most of the people stayed home and waited for the flood to finish. So there was no chance for them to go out and play.


Positive Long-Term Consequences

No Positive effect at all.






No
No


Negative Long-Term Consequences

Thailand is a country of rice. Poor people make most of their money by farming, But they lost their job because of the flood. So huge negative effect.




Same
Most of the people stayed home and waited for the flood to finish. So there was no chance for them to go out and play.

댓글 1개:

  1. Good thinking and filling in the boxes, but you need to be more specific. For example, bad for rich people, how so??
    Plus your environmental decision needs to be in question form. For example, "SHOULD THE GOVERNMENT BE EQUAL AND NOT BLOCK THE CITY?"
    90%

    답글삭제