Case
Study – Flood of Thailand 2011
<Selfish government made a
bad decision. I think people should be equal
Rich=Poor>
|
|||
Values
|
Economic
|
Education
|
Recreation
|
Positive Short-Term Consequences
|
Positive
to the rich people.
|
No,
|
No (except
computer addicted people)
|
Negative Short-Term Consequences
|
Negative
to the poor people because the government decided to protect Bangkok (Rich
people).
|
All
schools were closed for a while because it was very dangerous out there.
Students were not able to get a proper education.
|
Most of
the people stayed home and waited for the flood to finish. So there was no
chance for them to go out and play.
|
Positive Long-Term Consequences
|
No
Positive effect at all.
|
No
|
No
|
Negative Long-Term Consequences
|
Thailand
is a country of rice. Poor people make most of their money by farming, But
they lost their job because of the flood. So huge negative effect.
|
Same
|
Most of
the people stayed home and waited for the flood to finish. So there was no
chance for them to go out and play.
|